W ostatnich latach, Technologia komunikacji bezprzewodowej przyniosła bezprecedensowy rozwój w dziedzinie IoT. Ponieważ coraz więcej urządzeń łączy się z Internetem i między sobą, people can transfer data from one place to another without any physical connection. LoRaWAN technology and BLE technology are both wireless communication technologies, but there are some differences between the two. Na przykład, the former is widely used to transmit data over long distances, while BLE is often used to connect devices over short distances. W tym artykule, we will compare LoRaWAN beacons and Sygnalizatory Bluetooth, and help you understand which one is more suitable for your use cases.
Co jest a LoRaWAN Latarnia morska?
A wireless communication protocol called LoRaWAN (Sieć rozległa dalekiego zasięgu) was created for low-power, long-distance communication between IoT devices. LoRaWAN beacons use a low-frequency, long-range transmission method to communicate with gateways, which then send the data to the cloud for analysis. This technology is suitable for applications that require long-range communication, such as tracking assets in a large warehouse or monitoring soil moisture levels on a farm.
Co jest za Bluetooth Latarnia morska?
Bluetooth, z drugiej strony, is a short-range wireless communication protocol commonly used for personal area networks (PAN). Bluetooth beacons use high-frequency, short-range transmissions to communicate with nearby devices. This technology is suitable for applications that require short-range communication, such as tracking in a retail store or guiding visitors in a museum.
Applications of LoRaWAN Beacons and Bluetooth Beacons
LoRaWAN beacons
Śledzenie zasobów: LoRaWAN beacons can be used to track assets such as vehicles, pojemniki, i sprzęt. When LoRaWAN beacons are installed on assets, their location can be monitored remotely in real-time, even in areas with limited cellular coverage.
Smart farms: Real-time monitoring of crop soil moisture through Lora beacons and optimization of irrigation can reduce water consumption by more than 30%.
Dementia patients: Wearable beacons can monitor falls and track medications.
Efficient workspaces: LoRaWAN beacons can monitor whether an office room is occupied as well as room temperature and energy use, as well as check parking availability.
Smart waste bins: The capacity of the bin is sent to the staff through beacon alerts, and the pickup time is optimized by monitoring the capacity of the bin at each time period.
Sygnalizatory BLE
Marketing zbliżeniowy: BLE beacons recommend relevant discounts and new products based on a customer’s purchase history, helping marketers retain loyal customers and offer specific services based on the preferences chosen by new customers.
Nawigacja wewnętrzna: BLE beacons can use smartphone signals to locate indoors and take customers to their destinations.
Comparison Between LoRaWAN Beacons and Bluetooth Beacons
Aby pomóc klientom w podjęciu świadomej decyzji o tym, która lampa ostrzegawcza jest odpowiednia dla ich zastosowania, we have created a comparison table that covers 12 different aspects:
grubość niklu w złotym palcu | LoRaWAN Beacon | Sygnalizator Bluetooth |
---|---|---|
Zasięg | Do 15 km | Do 100m |
Żywotność baterii | Aż do 10 lat | Aż do 5 lat |
Czas oczekiwania | Wysoki (sekundy) | Niski(100ms+) |
Pobór energii | Bardzo niski | Niski |
Koszt | Od niskiego do wysokiego | Niski |
Prędkość transmisji danych | Niski | Wysoki |
Bezpieczeństwo | Wysoki | Średni |
Skalowalność | Wysoki | Średni |
Odporność na zakłócenia | Bardzo wysoko | Niski do umiarkowanego |
Deployment | Łatwy | Łatwy |
Topologia sieci | Gwiazda | Siatka |
Odpowiednie aplikacje | Śledzenie zasobów, Inteligentne miasta, Automatyka przemysłowa, Inteligentna opieka zdrowotna |
Nawigacja wewnętrzna, Marketing zbliżeniowy, Śledzenie zasobów, Usługi lokalizacyjne w czasie rzeczywistym |
Zasięg
BLE beacons are typically used for short-range communication within a range of about 10–100 meters. W przeciwieństwie, the LoRaWAN beacon is ideal for long-distance communication, with a range of up to 15 kilometers in urban environments and up to 40 kilometers in rural environments. This makes LoRaWAN well-suited for applications that require long-range connectivity, such as remote monitoring of agricultural fields or oil and gas pipelines.
Prędkość transmisji danych
Another difference is the type of data that can be transmitted using LoRaWAN. BLE beacons are designed for high-speed data transmission, which is useful for applications that require a lot of data to be transmitted quickly, such as streaming video. W przeciwieństwie, LoRaWAN beacons are designed for low-speed data transmission, which is more suitable for applications that require only small amounts of data to be transmitted, such as sensor readings.
Odporność na zakłócenia
In addition to their data rate and range, there is another reason why the LoRaWAN beacon is ideal for long-range communication. LoRaWAN beacons are particularly anti-jamming because they are not easily disturbed by obstacles and their signal is not interrupted by occlusion. Dzięki temu może śledzić lokalizację obiektów lub ludzi oraz to, czy sygnał jest blokowany przez ciała stałe, czy nie. On the contrary, the signal of BLE beacons is easily interrupted by obstacles.
Czas oczekiwania
Bluetooth beacons have a latency of 100-300 SM, while LoRaWAN Bluetooth beacon has a latency of several seconds. A BLE beacon is more suitable for applications that require low-latency communication.
Skalowalność
LoRaWAN is highly scalable, making it a good idea for use cases that need a lot of devices. Bluetooth is less scalable, making it better suited for smaller-scale applications.
Topologia sieci
LoRaWAN uses a star topology, while Bluetooth uses a mesh topology. This means that LoRaWAN is better suited for applications that require a centralized network, while Bluetooth is better suited for applications that require a decentralized network.
Bezpieczeństwo
LoRaWAN beacons have not only end-to-end AES128 encryption but also integrity protection, wzajemne uwierzytelnianie, i poufność. Your messages are safe while using LoRa to share or receive information. As for BLE beacons, beacon hacking is one of the most common risks. Hackers occasionally target beacons with weak security in public areas, despite the fact that the majority of beacon manufacturers now have measures in place to prevent this from happening. Bardzo ważne jest, aby zdać sobie sprawę, że beacony BLE są kupowane od godnych zaufania i niezawodnych dostawców, jak MOKOSmart, są 100 procent bezpieczny.
Future Developments in LoRzaBLADY and Bluetooth Beacon Technology
Emerging trends and innovations
LoRaWAN beacons
Because more LoRaWAN end nodes are being used for tracking and monitoring purposes, the hardware segment of the LoRaWAN market is anticipated to reach USD 30 miliard przez 2032. LoRaWAN trackers use GPS-powered sensors to transmit geolocation data about the assets they are attached to. They help businesses manage high-value equipment and also improve security during asset transportation. The trackers are additionally protected by a sealed, shock-resistant case, making them durable enough to withstand impacts from large machinery during transport and continue to function.
Sygnalizatory Bluetooth
Expect to see continued improvements in Bluetooth’s range, functionality, and power consumption, especially in more common examples of Bluetooth devices.
A BLE audio version that was published in 2020 enables the development of Bluetooth-enabled headphones with a lower battery or a leaner profile. In addition to the energy consumption improvements, the upgrade adds the ability to broadcast audio to multiple devices.
A new configuration option in Bluetooth 5 enables the device owner to reduce the packet size in exchange for a greater transmission range without sacrificing functionality.
Potencjał dla rozwiązań hybrydowych
BLE and LoRaWAN beacons complement each other’s strengths, making them ideal for a variety of applications.
Until recently, BLE usage was limited to low throughput endpoints like beacons and wearables. jednak, the latest Bluetooth 5.0 can send large data files or stream audio without quickly draining your device’s battery. On the other side, LoRaWAN beacons meet the demand for widely used, low-cost sensors that must transmit little data packets over a great distance. BLE and LoRa are crucial requirements that make up a complete wireless solution for low-power IoT applications. Low-power long-range connectivity is addressed by LoRa, whereas low-power short-range connectivity is addressed by BLE.
Wniosek
W ostatnich latach, there have been many studies on the development of IoT, which have led to its improvement. The evolution of LoRaWAN and BLE beacons is a powerful solution to resolve the issues and obstacles associated with the IoT due to the rapid increase of IoT devices and applications such as asset tracking, e-learning, Inteligentne miasta, opieka zdrowotna, and environmental protection.
jednak, LoRaWAN beacons and BLE beacons have distinct differences in terms of range, Szybkość transmisji danych, interference resistance, and latency. While Bluetooth beacons are better suited for indoor location-based services that demand low power consumption, LoRaWAN beacons are ideal for transmitting data over long distances. Which beacon type is best for you will depend on the particular needs of your use case when deciding between the two.
Mokosmart is a reliable company that specializes in developing and manufacturing both BLE and LoRaWAN beacons. We work closely with our clients to help them design the ideal beacon by understanding their unique goals. With the help of a trusted provider, możesz wybrać odpowiednią technologię beacon do swoich potrzeb i cieszyć się zaletami łączności IoT.
CONTINUE READING ABOUT LOW-ENERGY BEACONS